top of page

NEUROFEEDBACK CAN:

Improve autism symptoms by speeding up Beta brainwaves

Increase attention and focus for kids with attention deficit disorders

Improve depression symptoms by speeding up Alpha brainwaves

Reduce anxiety and stress by slowing down Beta brainwaves

Improve sleep disorders by slowing Delta brainwaves

Improve memory by speeding up Theta brainwaves

Regulate the brainwaves responsible for addiction, which can reduce cravings

NEUROFEEDBACK IS NOT NEW

It’s been around since the 1960’s. There are decades of research and case studies that document its effectiveness in improving brain health. Advances in computer technology have made it possible for doctors to easily administer neurofeedback in their clinic.


The most common application of the Neurofeedback technology is in epilepsies, migraine, ADD/ADHD, developmental disorders, autism spectrum disorder, affective disorders, concussions/TBI, Dementia/Alzheimer's and other cognitive decline issues, addiction, depression, anxiety, Lyme, stroke, PTSD, and psychotic disorders. NF can also be beneficial for everyday issues surrounding stress, energy levels/fatigue, and pain, etc.

What is Neurofeedback?

Neurofeedback does not directly target conditions and symptoms: it corrects irregular brainwaves and modifies timing patterns in the brain. This is achieved over multiple neurofeedback sessions, as the brain is re-trained into normal patterns. The result is an improvement in brain regulation, which can impact a variety of symptoms.

music_noteThink of your brain as a musical quartet: When all musicians are in sync, the sound is harmonious. But if one musician is out of tune, the overall sound is affected. Brainwaves operate in much the same way, working together to keep your mind and body in sync and running smoothly. But if any brainwaves are off, it can impact your entire system negatively. Many common conditions like anxiety, depression and others can occur when brainwaves are running too fast or too slow. 


Neurofeedback teaches the brain to regulate its brainwaves properly, which can result in better overall health.

Neurofeedback is direct training of brain function, by which the brain learns to function more efficiently. We observe the brain in action from moment to moment. We show that information back to the person. And we reward the brain for changing its own activity to more appropriate patterns. This is a gradual learning process. It applies to any aspect of brain function that we can measure. Neurofeedback is also called EEG Biofeedback, because it is based on electrical brain activity, the electroencephalogram, or EEG. 

Neurofeedback is training in self-regulation. It is simply biofeedback applied to the brain directly. Self-regulation is a necessary part of good brain function. Self-regulation training allows the system (the central nervous system) to function better.

Neurofeedback (NF) or electroencephalogram (EEG)-Biofeedback literally means “brain” and “input”, where the brain is monitored and input is given instantly. Neurofeedback specifically monitors brainwaves, looks for irregularities, then produces a signal that is designed to correct the irregularity and guide the brainwave back into a healthy pattern. With repetition of this process over time, the brain will learn to stay in healthy ranges without the aid of the computer. The result is an improvement in brain regulation, which in turn can reduce or eliminate most neurological symptoms.

Neurofeedback has 3 main goals:


-Identify irregular brainwaves (Alpha, Beta, Delta and Theta)

-Guide those brainwaves back into regular patterns

-Teach the brain to maintain regular patterns permanently


Neurofeedback works primarily by monitoring brainwaves on the surface of your head. To start, small electrodes are placed on your scalp. These electrodes have a paste on them which makes it easier to pick up brainwave patterns. For the next 30 minutes, you get to watch a movie of your choice, listen to your music or listen to an audio book. That is all that is required of you. Is is non-invasive, uses no drugs and does not involve any radiation.


Neurofeedback ComputerDuring a normal session the computer is monitoring your brainwaves, looking for any that are out of the normal range. When it finds one, the system triggers a response that changes the movie or music. This change is not annoying, but it is subtle enough to get your attention and make you focus more. Refocusing corrects the irregular brainwaves, which then move into the normal range. At that time the movie or music will resume normally. This process is called Operant Conditioning. 


Over the course of multiple sessions, the brain eventually learns to make healthy patterns on it’s own. At that time, no further neurofeedback sessions are needed.


NF is a drug-free form of brain training to directly alter the underlying neural mechanisms of cognition and behavior. It is a technique that measures a subject's EEG signal, processes it in real time, with the goal to enable a behavioral modification by modulating brain activity.

This page shows an analysis of each lobe of the brain (frontal, parietal, central, temporal and occipital) for each type of brain wave: Delta, Theta, Alpha, Beta. Green indicates a normal level, red is elevated and yellow is extreme.


Brain Mapping (Includes a 30 min. coaching session to discuss Report of Findings and best course of action.)


Initial - $295

Follow-up - $250


Neurofeedback Sessions (30 min/ea.)

Children:

10 pack - $1,000

20 pack -$1,850

40 pack - $3,600* 

*can be shared among family members; includes 1 follow-up brain map.

Portable Brain Trainer units can also be purchased for convenient and unlimited home use - $3,795

The Clear Mind Brain Fitness difference

There are many different types of neurofeedback machines available for clinicians. So what makes the Clear Mind Neurointegration System different? Photic Stimulation Lights.

The Clear Mind system uses photic stimulation technology to increase the benefits of neurofeedback. Research has shown that stimulating the brain with pulsing lights during neurofeedback will result in more accurate detection of abnormal brainwave activities. Clear Mind Center is unique in offering this technology with its neurofeedback system.

Clear Mind Brain Mapping 


This can be done as a preventative measure and used as a marker to give a person a baseline as to their brain function. This can be very helpful for a person in the event of future trauma, illnesses, etc.


A Brain Map is a scan of your brainwaves performed using a cap on the head. This method is known as an electroencephalogram (EEG) and provides an accurate recording of your normal brain function. Our system records brainwave activity and compares it to benchmark standards of normal brain function to determine if problems are present. It does not identify specific conditions: It shows a map of problem areas in the brain that the doctor can use to identify potential conditions.


Why Are Brainwaves Important?

There are 4 main brainwaves in your head. Delta brainwaves are responsible for sleep, rest and recharging. Theta brainwaves control your subconscious. Alpha brainwaves regulate your emotions and feelings. Beta brainwaves control conscious thought and decision making.


Do these things sound important? They are, and poorly regulated brainwaves can cause many issues to appear. A brain map can identify brainwaves in all areas of the brain that are not operating efficiently. It takes the guesswork out of the assessment process and provides an accurate road map for improving your health and well being.


This page of the report shows the Emotional and Cognitive Analysis which compares the results of your self-assessment against the results of the brain map and helps identify problem areas within the brain. Red indicates a strong potential match, green indicates no match.

A customized protocol will be generated based on the brain map assessment.

THE SCIENCE

Research shows that people who suffer from neurological issues can have irregular brainwaves. As an example, a person with ADD will have slower Beta brainwaves, which are responsible for attention and focus. They also have faster Theta brainwaves, which can lead to daydreaming.


Training the brain can change these brainwaves over time, speeding them up or slowing them down where needed. Neurofeedback can improve alertness, attention, emotional regulation, behavior, cognitive function, and mental flexibility. When brainwaves are running at the right speed, users will often see a reduction in symptoms.


Results are often permanent, which may allow someone to eliminate medications completely. Where medications only manage the symptoms, the goal of neurofeedback is to address the underlying cause and restore normal brainwave function.


Over 1,000 studies have been published related to neurofeedback and biofeedback. The early animal research, which has been validated in many peer-reviewed journals since the 1970s, showed: that brainwaves can be changed through operant conditioning, and that seizures are reduced with EEG training. These studies were originally done in the 1960’s using cats with no chance of placebo effects. Since the 1970’s research has been verified in human studies, and based on decades of additional research on humans of all ages the basis for neurofeedback has become extremely solid. 

Here are some studies to further your research:

  • ADHD
    A 2012 meta-analysis published in the Journal of Attention Disorders found EEG neurofeedback to be more than twice as effective in treating the core symptoms of ADHD as compared to: working memory training, behavior modification, school-based behavior therapy, behaviorally-based parent training, and behavioral self-monitoring.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=neurofeedback+adhd

    (Broad Search Results for Nuerofeedback and ADHD)

  • Anxiety
    Anxiety is a core human emotion but can become pathologically dysregulated.

    Orbitofrontal Cortex Neurofeedback Produces Lasting Changes in Contamination Anxiety and Resting-state Connectivity [pdf]

    Translational Psychiatry (2013)

    Abstract

    NF training also increased subjects’ control over contamination anxiety several days after the completion of NF training. Changes in resting-state connectivity in the target orbitofrontal region correlated with these improvements in anxiety. Matched subjects undergoing a sham feedback control task showed neither a reorganization of resting-state functional connectivity nor an improvement in anxiety. These data suggest that NF can enable enhanced control over anxiety by persistently reorganizing relevant brain networks and thus support the potential of NF as a clinically useful therapy.

  • Depression
    Real-Time Self-Regulation of Emotion Networks in Patients with Depression [pdf]
    David E. J. Linden, Isabelle Habes, Stephen J. Johnston,
    Stefanie Linden, Ranjit Tatineni, Leena Subramanian, Bettina Sorger, David Healy1, Rainer Goebe
    Abstract: Many patients show no or incomplete responses to current pharmacological or psychological therapies for depression. Here we explored the feasibility of a new brain self-regulation technique that integrates psychological and neurobiological approaches through neurofeedback with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In a proof-of-concept study, eight patients with depression learned to upregulate brain areas involved in the generation of positive emotions (such as the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) and insula) during four neurofeedback sessions. Their clinical symptoms, as assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS), improved significantly. A control group that underwent a training procedure with the same cognitive strategies but without neurofeedback did not improve clinically. Randomized blinded clinical trials are now needed to exclude possible placebo effects and to determine whether fMRI-based neurofeedback might become a useful adjunct to current therapies for depression.     www.plosone.org
  • PTSD/Stress
    The long-term costs of traumatic stress: intertwined physical and psychological consequences [pdf]
    Alexander C. McFarlane
    World Psychiatry 9:1 - February 2010

    ABSTRACT

    There is now an established literature about abnormalities of quantitative EEG which suggest a significant disruption of cortical arousal in PTSD (100). Neurofeedback has been used in other disorders where there are demonstrated ab- normalities of cortical activity. Particularly in populations at a significant risk for PTSD, such as military and emergency service groups, the use of this technique may be beneficial.

  • Neuroscience: According to the peer-reviewed journal Clinical EEG &
    “Quantitative EEG has been shown to be highly sensitive (96%) in identifying post-concussion syndrome, and neurofeedback has been shown in a number of studies to be effective in significantly improving or redressing the symptoms of post-concussion syndrome”
  • Alzheimer’s & Dementia:
    According to the peer-reviewed journal
    “Alzheimer’s research has shown that changes in the brain can occur up to 20 years or more before symptoms appear. Studies strongly support the use of EEG Neurofeedback as an early stage intervention.”
    Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association
    Volume 5, Issue 4, Supplement, Page e8, July 2009
  • Chronic Pain
    New Hope for Sufferers of Chronic Pain [pdf]
    by Siegfried Othmer, Ph.D.
    Brain waves are a representation of the way you pay attention, both to the outside world and to your internal feelings. In the case of chronic pain, the brain is paying too much attention and has become over-sensitized. By learning to control your brain waves with the aid of EEG biofeedback, you can affect the underlying behavior patterns of your attention and return your brain's pain sensitivity to normal levels.
  • Migraines
    Neurofeedback and biofeedback with 37 migraineurs: a clinical outcome study [pdf]
    Deborah A Stokes, Martha S Lappin Behavioral and Brain Functions 2010, 6:9
    ABSTRACT
    Of the 37 migraine patients treated, 26 patients or 70% experienced at least a 50% reduction in the frequency of their headaches which was sustained on average 14.5 months after treatments were discontinued.
    Conclusions: All combined neuro and biofeedback interventions were effective in reducing the frequency of migraines with clients using medication resulting in a more favorable outcome (70% experiencing at least a 50% reduction in headaches) than just medications alone (50% experience a 50% reduction) and that the effect size of our study involving three different types of biofeedback for migraine (1.09) was more robust than effect size of combined studies on thermal biofeedback alone for migraine

TONS MORE RESEARCH AVAILABLE HERE:

Ahmadlou M, Rostami R, and Sadeghi V., Which attention-deficit / hyperactivity disorder children will be improved through neurofeedback therapy?, Neuroscience Letters, 516, 2012, pp 156-60

Baehr, E., Rosenfeld, J. P., & Baehr, R.. Clinical use of an alpha asymmetry neurofeedback protocol in the treatment of mood disorders: Follow-up study one to five years post therapy. Journal of Neurotherapy, 2001 4(4), 11-18.

Butler, Katy - Alice in Neuroland, Sept/Oct 2005, Psychotherapy Networker. 

Brod TM: Notes on brainwave biofeedback for young people: AD/HD and related issues. in Incorvia JA, Mark-Goldstein BS, and Tessmer D (eds): Understanding, Diagnosing And Treating AD/HD Children And Adolescents. Jason Aronson 1999

Chabot RJ, diMichele F, Prichep L, John ER:The clinical role of computerized EEG in the evaluation and treatment of learning and attention disorders in children and adolescents. J Neuropsychiatry and Clin Neuroscience, 2001; 13: 171-186

Duffy FH (2000). The state of EEG biofeedback therapy (EEG operant conditioning) in 2000: an editor’s opinion Clinical Electroencephalography, 31, v-vii.

Egner T, & Gruzelier JH (2004). The temporal dynamics of electroencephalographic responses to alpha/theta neurofeedback training in healthy subjects. Journal of Neurotherapy, 8, 43-57.

Egner T, Gruzelier JH Learned self-regulation of EEG frequency components affects attention and event-related brain potentials in humans. Neuroreport 2001, 12:411-415

Egner T, Gruzelier JH Ecological validity of neurofeedback: modulation of slow wave EEG enhances musical performance.  

Neuroreport 2003a, 14:1223-1228

Egner T, Gruzelier JH EEG biofeedback of low bnd beta components: frequency-specific effects of variables of attention and event-related brain potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2003b, in press

Evans J, Abarbanel A (eds), Quantitative EEG and Neurofeedback, San Diego, Academic Press, 1999

Fernández T et al (2003). EEG and behavioral changes following neurofeedback treatment in learning disabled children. Clinical Electroencephalography, 34, 145-52

Fisher S, Riding the Waves: Neurofeedback: A breakthrough with learning disabilities? Psychotherapy Networker, Sept/October, page 77-83. 2004 (click here for full article)

Fuchs T, Birbaumer N, Lutzenberger W, Gruzielier JH, Kaiser J, Neurofeedback treatment for ADHD in children: a comparison with methylphenidate, Appl Psychophys 

Biofeedback 2003 Mar 28 (1):1-12

Gevensleben H, Rothenberger A, Moll GH, and Heinrich H., Neurofeedback in children with ADHD: validation and challenges. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 12, 2012, pp 447-60

Goldberg E, The Executive Brain: Frontal Lobes And The Civilized Mind, Oxford, 2001

Gruzelier, J & Egner,T. Critical validation studies of neurofeedback. Child Adolesc Psychiatric Clinics N Am 2005; 83-104.

Hammond DC. , Neurofeedback with anxiety and affective disorders. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2005 Jan;14(1):105-23, vii.

Hammond C. QEEG-Guided Neurofeedback in the Treatment of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Journal of Neurotherapy, 2003; Vol 7(2)

Hammond DC: Medical justification for neurofeedback with ADD/ADHD. Journal of Neurotherapy, 2000; 4(1), 90-93.

Hirshberg LM, Chiu S, Frazier JA., 

Emerging brain-based interventions for children and adolescents: overview and clinical perspective. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2005 Jan;14(1):1-19, v

Jarusiewicz, B. 

Efficacy of Neurofeedback for Children in the Autistic Spectrum: A Pilot Study, Journal of Neurotherapy, 2002; Vol 6(4), 39-49

Kaiser DA, Othmer S: Effect of Neurofeedback on variables of attention in a large multi-center trial. Journal of Neurotherapy, 2000 4(1), 5-15.

Lantz D, & Sterman MB: Neuropsychological assessment of subjects with uncontrolled epilepsy: Effects of EEG biofeedback training. Epilepsia, 1988; 29(2), 163-171.

Laurence Hirshberg, Ph.D., Retraining the Brain, Using Neurofeedback to Help Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders, May-June 2004 issue of the Autism Asperger’s Digest,

Levesque J, Beauregard M, Mensour B.: Effect of neurofeedback training on the neural substrates of selective attention in children with ADD/ADHD: A functional MRI study. Neurosci Lett. 2006 Feb 20;394(3):216-21.

Lofthouse N, Arnold LE, Hersch S, Hurt E, and DeBeus R., A review of neurofeedback treatment for pediatric ADHD., Journal of Attention Disorders, 16, 2012, pp 351-72

Lofthouse N, Arnold LE, and Hurt E. Current status of neurofeedback for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.  

Current Psychiatry Reports, 14, 2012, pp 536-42

Loo SK, EEG and neurofeedback findings in ADHD The ADHD Report, 2003,. 11:3, 1-4

Loo SK, Barkley RA: Clinical Utility of EEG in ADHD. Applied Neuropsychology 2005, Vol. 12, 64-76

Lubar JF: Neocortical Dynamics: implications for understanding the role of neurofeedback and related techniques for the enhancement of attention. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 1997 22: 111-25.

Lubar JF and Lubar JO: Neurofeedback assessment and treatment for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders. in Evans JR and Abarbanel A (eds): Introduction to Quantitative EEG and Neurofeedback, Academic Press 1999

Masterpasqua, F; Healey, KN 

Neurofeedback in Psychological Practice; Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 2003; Vol 34(6), Dec. pp. 652-656

McCarthy-Jones S., Taking back the brain: could neurofeedback training be effective for relieving distressing auditory verbal hallucinations in patients with Schizophrenia?, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 38, 2012, pp 678-82

Meyer-Lindenberg A, Ziemann U, Hajak G, et al:. Transitions between dynamical states of differing stability in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; Aug 20;99(17):10948-53.

Monastra VJ, Electroencephalographic biofeedback (neurotherapy) as a treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: rationale and empirical foundation. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2005 Jan;14(1):55-82, vi.

Monastra VJ, Lubar JF, Linden M: the development of a quantitative electroencephalographic scanning process for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: reliability and validation studies. Neuropsychology, 2001 15: 136-144.

Monastra VJ., Monastra DM., & George,S. . The effects of stimulant therapy, EEG biofeedback, and parenting style on the primary symptoms of ADHD. Applied Psychophysiology & Biofeedback, 2002, 27(4), 231-249.

Moriyama TS, Polanczyk G, Caye A, Banaschewski T, Brandeis D, and Rohde LA. Evidence-based information on the clinical use of neurofeedback for ADHD. 

Neurotherapeutics, 9, 2012, pp 588-98

Nan W, Rodrigues JP, Ma J, Qu X, Wan F, Mak PI, Mak PU, Vai MI, and Rosa A., Individual alpha neurofeedback training effect on short term memory. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 86, 2012, pp 83-7

Nash JK, Treatment of ADHD with neurotherapy. Clinical Electroencephalography 2000, 31(1), 30-37

Nazari MA, Mosanezhad E, Hashemi T, and Jahan A., The effectiveness of neurofeedback training on EEG coherence and neuropsychological functions in children with reading disability.

Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 43, 2012, pp 315-22

Nelson DV, and Esty ML., Neurotherapy of traumatic brain injury/posttraumatic stress symptoms in OEF/OIF veterans. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 24, 2012, pp 237-40

Peniston, EG, Kulkosky, PJ, VA Hospital: Alcoholic Personality and Alpha-theta Brainwave Training. Medical Psychotherapy, 1990, Volume 3, pp.37-55

Peniston EG, Marrinan DA, Deming WA, and Kulkosky PJ: EEG alpha-theta brainwave synchronization in Vietnam veterans with combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol abuse. Adv Med Psychotherapy 1993 6: 37-30

Pineda JA, Juavinett A, and Datko M., Self-regulation of brain oscillations as a treatment for aberrant brain connections in children with autism. Medical Hypotheses, 79, 2012, pp 790-8

Pulvermuller F, Mohr, Schleichert H, Veit, R: Operant conditioning of left hemispheric slow cortical potentials and its effect on word processing. Biological Psychology, 2000; 53, 177-215.

Rosenfeld JP: An EEG Biofeedback Protocol for Affective Disorders. Clin Electroencephalography 2000:7-12

Ros T, Théberge J, Frewen PA, Kluetsch R, Densmore M, Calhoun VD, and Lanius RA., Mind over chatter: Plastic up-regulation of the fMRI salience network directly after EEG neurofeedback. NeuroImage, 65, 2013, pp 324-35

Rossiter, T.R., & La Vaque, T.J. A comparison of EEG biofeedback and psychostimulants in treating attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Neurotherapy, . 1995; 1, 48-59

Ryback R, Bioelectrical modulators and the cell membrane in psychiatric medicine. Psychopharmacology Bulletin 35: 4,Autumn 2001, 5-44

Saxby E, Peniston EG. Alpha-theta brainwave neurofeedback training: an effective treatment for male and female alcoholics with depressive symptoms. J Clin Psychol. 1995 Sep;51(5):685-93

Scharnowski F, Hutton C, Josephs O, Weiskopf N, and Rees G., Improving Visual Perception through Neurofeedback. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 2012, pp 17830-41

Scott, Kaiser, Othmer, Sideroff, , Effects of an EEG Biofeedback Protocol on a Mixed Substance Abusing Population A J Alcohol Drug Abuse, Volume 31, Number 3 / 2005 Pages: 455 – 469

Schore A, Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self,., Laurence Erlbaum, 1994

Schore A, Affect Dysregulation and Disorders of the Self,.,Norton, 2003

Schore A, Affect Regulation and the Repair of Self, Norton, 2003

Sebern Fisher, Riding the Waves, Psychotherapy Networker, Sep/Oct 2004; Vol. 28 A good discussion of psychotherapy and neurofeedback.

Sterman MB: Basic concepts and clinical findings in the treatment of seizure disorders with EEG operant conditioning. Clinical Electroencephalography, 2000;31(1), 45-55.

Sterman MB: Physiological origins and functional correlates of EEG rhythmic activities: implications for self-regulation. 

Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 1996 21:3-34

Surmeli T, Ertem A, Eralp E, and Kos IH., Schizophreniaand the efficacy of qEEG-guided neurofeedback treatment: a clinical case series. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 43, 2012, pp 133-44

Thompson L, Thompson M. Neurofeedback combined with training in metacognitive strategies: effectiveness in students with ADD. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 1998 Dec;23(4):243-63.

Tansey MA. A simple and a complex tic (Tourette’s syndrome): their response to EEG sensorimotor rhythm biofeedback training. Int J Psychophysiol. 1986 Jul; 4(2): 91-97

Tinius TP, Tinius KA: Changes after EEG biofeedback and cognitive retraining in adults with mild traumatic brain injury and attention deficit disorder. Journal of Neurotherapy, 2001; 4(2), 27-44. (must go half way down the page to find abstract)

Trudeau DL., Applicability of brain wave biofeedback to substance use disorder in adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2005 Jan;14(1):125-36, vii

Uhlmann C, Froscher W. Biofeedback treatment in patients with refractory epilepsy: Changes in depression and control orientation. Seizure 2001, 10(1), 34-38.

Vernon D, Egner T, Cooper N, Compton T, Neilands C, Sheri A, Gruzielier J, The effect of training distinct neurofeedback protocols on aspects of cognitive performance. Intl J Psychophys, 2003, 47: 75-86

Walker JE, Kozlowski GP, Neurofeedback treatment of epilepsy. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2005 Jan;14(1):163-76, viii.

bottom of page